Trusts 101: Benefits of a Trust Before Death

by Jonathan A. Nelson

My previous post in the Trusts 101 series looked at benefits an estate planning trust provides in setting plans for after death, but there can be benefits before death and in certain circumstances it can be very helpful.  These include:

 1.       Incapacity Planning: To the extent assets have been transferred into the trust, a successor trustee is often able to manage finances more systematically and smoothly than someone using a power of attorney, as the trust covers contingencies the POA may not.  In the event of an unexpected incapacity, the authority and flexibility of a trust can be very helpful in both moving quickly and weathering the storm.

2.       Orderly Transitions:  With a gradually increasing incapacity, the trust can allow a cooperative and progressive transition using a co-trustee to make up for what the grantor can’t do at this moment, or anymore.  The trust and its separate recordkeeping also offer better protections against financial abuse, particularly in the event the incapacity interferes with the ability to see how the other person is assisting, versus a power of attorney.

3.       Complex Family Dynamics: Every family is different, and sometimes peace is best kept by addressing natural points of discord.  These may include children from separate relationships, spouses with different life expectancies, and interaction with extended family; or, before the grantor’s death, accounting for a loved one who is disabled, struggles with addictions, has litigious tendencies, or is manipulative (or vulnerable) where money is concerned.  For all of these, building provisions into the trust now can give the grantor peace of mind and free those relationships from being dominated by money concerns.

4.       Management of Business or Investment Property: There is significant overlap with post-death benefits of having a transition plan in place for a business or investment, but you can find improved ability to retain talent or attract investors when you have such a plan.

5.       Early Involvement of Professional Management: For some people, the amount of work or the needs of their survivors will push them toward having professional or corporate trustees after death. Where those trustees are already involved before death (such as if a grantor steps down as trustee or passes along the management of assets), it can make the transition smoother.

6.       Segregated Assets for Particular Purposes:  Not all estate plans call for a single trust to do everything.  Whether there are guarantees in a premarital agreement or legal or moral obligations from a prior marriage, a standalone trust or a subtrust with distinct assets can be a convenient way to earmark assets and provide specific instructions to a future trustee.

7.       Balanced Interests of Beneficiaries: Similarly, not all needs of future beneficiaries are known at the time a trust is set up, and sometimes the level of control provided by a trust can be useful in establishing a balance in access between current family members and a subsequent spouse, or account for significant lifetime transfers to be accounted for as between children.

8.       Some Protections against Creditors (Including Future Creditors of Beneficiaries): While true creditor protection trusts are set up very differently from most estate planning trusts, there is still an element of protection the trust can provide, including against predatory “inheritance advance” lenders.

Next in this series: When Would a Trust be Unnecessary or Counterproductive?

Virginia attorney Jonathan A. Nelson uses his extensive legal knowledge and trial experience to resolve conflicts, negotiate settlements, navigate compliance matters, and vigorously advocate in the courtroom in order to achieve the best possible outcomes for his clients. He practices in estate planning, probate, trust and estate administration, corporate law, and civil litigation related to these fields.

The attorneys of Smith Pugh & Nelson, PLC, offer the experienced counsel, personal attention, and customized legal services needed to address the many complex issues surrounding estate planning, probate, and trust administration. Contact us at (703) 777-6084 to schedule a consultation.

LAW UPDATE: Virginia Legislature Kills Electronic Estate Plan Documents (Again)

by Jonathan A. Nelson

With the Virginia legislature past the halfway point for its 2025 legislative session, I see that this year’s iteration of electronic estate plan documents has died in committee.  While variations on this theme are introduced every year (and while I don’t usually wade publicly into politics), there are a few good reasons to avoid electronic estate plan documents, even if you do live somewhere that has authorized them.

Since the 1677 Statute of Frauds in England, there has been a high level of formality required for fiduciary documents.  The documents set forth a person’s instructions in circumstances where they cannot personally attend to them (whether a will, which only takes effect after the death of the testator, or a power of attorney, which is utilized while the principal is physically absent).  By the end of the 1800s, formality reached a high-water mark where documents were thrown out for small failures, such as a witness leaving the room then coming back or a testator signing a sealed envelope containing a will but not the will itself.  Over time since then, the pendulum has swung in the opposite direction, with courts approving for probate notes by the attorney that the testator had never seen, a digital page from an electronic notetaking program, and (in one Australian case) an unsent text message.

In Virginia, there is a statute setting out the required formalities (Va. Code § 64.2-403), but also a “savings statute” (Va. Code § 64.2-404) allowing a judge to find that a document was intended as a will notwithstanding failing certain formalities.  The statute nonetheless makes clear that the one unwaivable formality is the testator’s signature; the case law requires that the document itself be intended as a will, and merely expressing intent to make a gift in a future will is insufficient.

The debate on level of formality is often cast as finding the balance between allowing a person to freely express their wishes and making sure they are in fact firm intentions and not just passing thoughts.  There is a third part to the equation often left out, however: the people implementing the documents.  An executor must swear that the document presented is, to the best of his knowledge, the last will of the deceased; he is then charged with administering the estate in accordance with those instructions.  On either count, he is at some risk if he has sworn that oath and begun paying creditors or making distributions and then someone shows up later with a text message.  This risk is present for physical documents with signatures, too, but at a much lower threshold since a testator would tend to keep important documents where they can be found.  There are implementation problems even for a document like a power of attorney – an agent presenting an original physical copy (say, at a bank) is helpful authentication that the power has not been revoked, but an electronic copy cannot be pulled back in the same way.

As much as electronic indications of agreement or consent are useful for internet commerce and everything from youth sports leagues to land transactions, some documents are so important that the formalities of using paper are still very helpful, and at the top of my list are wills and powers of attorney.

Virginia attorney Jonathan A. Nelson uses his extensive legal knowledge and trial experience to resolve conflicts, negotiate settlements, navigate compliance matters, and vigorously advocate in the courtroom in order to achieve the best possible outcomes for his clients. He practices in estate planning, probate, trust and estate administration, corporate law, and civil litigation related to these fields.

The attorneys of Smith Pugh & Nelson, PLC, offer the experienced counsel, personal attention, and customized legal services needed to address the many complex issues surrounding estate planning, probate, and trust administration. Contact us at (703) 777-6084 to schedule a consultation.

Trusts 101: Why Use a Trust?

by Jonathan A. Nelson

Revocable living trusts are the most used trusts in our practice.  They are powerful and useful estate planning tools, but they aren’t right for everyone, and I don’t try to oversell them.  Trusts often require considerable customization by the attorney to meet the individual’s needs and circumstances, time and perseverance on the client’s part to fund the trust properly (if I prepare your trust, I provide you with some instructions for this), and a higher commitment for the Trustees to maintaining the assets and documents versus other types of estate planning.  Further, the documents are considerably longer (one local firm’s stock trust is 1.5 times as long as The Lion, the Witch, and the Wardrobe; mine are significantly shorter, but are still a lot of reading) and they require more work just to understand what is required by the document.

 Given the effort and cost involved, clients sometimes wonder what advantages a trust has over just having a will.  Bear in mind that with a will, a probate estate is opened with the court, and the executor’s three jobs, roughly speaking, are to gather the assets, pay the creditors, and distribute to beneficiaries.  For what happens to your estate plan after you pass away, a trust allows key differences, including:

1.       Probate Avoidance: Assets pass outside of probate, saving time and costs, including state and local probate taxes.  The Trustee still has an obligation to account for the assets, but instead of reporting to a court-appointed Commissioner of Accounts, the Trustee only needs to satisfy the beneficiaries that the accounting is sufficient.

2.       Unified Planning: A trust can unify and distribute all assets, versus the more splintered usage of beneficiary designations on death, reducing the chance of accidental inequity, unintended consequences (such as what happens if the only named beneficiary on the form has passed), and potential for abuse.  There are also better options to prioritize gifts in a different order than the law sets for estates, in the event there are unsatisfied creditor claims.

3.       Investment Goals: Trusts allow continuity and direction for labor intensive or time sensitive holdings, such as rental properties or small businesses, and allow the appropriate person to become (or remain) the manager, rather than throwing in all of the beneficiaries as partners.  In many instances, this is very helpful in avoiding liquidation of investments at a suboptimal time.

4.       Tailored Distributions: In most cases, distributions from a trust can be designed with more detail, more structured timeframes, and more flexibility for future contingencies than wills allow.  A distribution under a will is almost always the asset or cash being given to a beneficiary as soon as probate is complete, with no strings or oversight; a trust can change any aspect of that distribution, in many variations, including: 

a. A trustee can manage assets and expenses in the short or long term for a beneficiary who still needs to mature or has limitations.  This includes minors, special needs beneficiaries, or beneficiaries with substance abuse issues, but is sometimes used just to stretch out distributions over some years. That might be done to minimize tax liability, protect heirs from creditors, or even allow a  beneficiary to gain experience in financial management progressively before receiving the bulk of their inheritance.

b. The assets can be held for a specific amount of time and the income paid annually to a beneficiary, while the principle is held for or distributed to another person (for instance, a second spouse who is a lifetime income beneficiary before the principle passes to the prior children).  Alternatively, income and principle could be used for particular contingencies (such as care and veterinary costs during the life of a pet).

c. Gifts can be made contingent on future events (such as a child’s successful graduation from college) or future needs (like down payment for a beneficiary’s first home or a reserve fund for a parent’s elder care).

5.       Creditor Protection: The anticipated benefit under a will can be attached by a beneficiary’s creditor, included in the beneficiary’s divorce proceeding, or even contracted away inadvisedly by the beneficiary himself; a trust can provide protection against any of these.

6.       Charitable Giving: Some giving strategies, particularly ones that seek tax advantages by blending giving with gifts to beneficiaries, require using a trust to lock the plan into place.

7.       Reduced Taxes: Using a trust can provide exemptions or strategic timing of transfers or values used, thus reducing Federal and state tax obligations while ensuring the assets still serve their intended purposes.

Whether you are planning, administering, or benefiting from a trust, an experienced estate planning attorney can ensure you understand the outcomes, obligations, and processes involved.

Next time in Trusts 101: Benefits of a Trust Before Death

Virginia attorney Jonathan A. Nelson uses his extensive legal knowledge and trial experience to resolve conflicts, negotiate settlements, navigate compliance matters, and vigorously advocate in the courtroom in order to achieve the best possible outcomes for his clients. He practices in estate planning, probate, trust and estate administration, corporate law, and civil litigation related to these fields.

The attorneys of Smith Pugh & Nelson, PLC, offer the experienced counsel, personal attention, and customized legal services needed to address the many complex issues surrounding estate planning, probate, and trust administration. Contact us at (703) 777-6084 to schedule a consultation.

Lessons from Litigation: No-Contest Confusion Helps a Church

by Jonathan A. Nelson

Virginia has a long and storied relationship with no-contest (or ‘in terrorem’) clauses, where a beneficiary can be cut out of an estate or trust if they bring a legal challenge to the testamentary document or certain incidents of administration.  Many people writing estate plans see such clauses as an antidote to family dissention, protection against a particular black sheep, or just a way to provide a final “don’t tread on my estate plan” from the grave.

As with any sharp tool, these clauses must be used with care; not appreciating their dangers can have unintended consequences. A Virginia Supreme Court case from 1956,  Womble v. Gunter, provides a stark warning of this possibility.  The Court begins with a near-Dickensian opening paragraph presaging the conflict to come:

George F. Parramore, Sr., died testate on June 4, 1945. His somewhat complicated will, including five codicils, was duly probated and Benj. T. Gunter, Jr., and Quinton G. Nottingham qualified as executors. The testator devised and bequeathed all of his property in various amounts and proportions to his ten living children and numerous grandchildren.

In all, there were thirty named family beneficiaries among the six documents.  The Will had a no-contest clause, which ended with, “Should all my legatees and devisees contest my will, then my entire estate shall pass to Christ Episcopal Church in Eastville.”  Although not discussed in the opinion, once admitted to probate, the will and all five codicils became treated as one document, with the result that a challenge to even one portion became a challenge to the whole unless fully successful. 

The hitherto amicable family descended into dissention, centered on a suit to invalidate the will.  When the dust had settled, the trial court concluded that all thirty beneficiaries had challenged the will and lost any benefit from the estate. 

Although not in the Supreme Court record, I think it a good assumption that at least some of the codicils reflected changes between the interests of the different beneficiaries and changes of who the executors would be; further, because the changes were by codicil, the beneficiaries could see the changes over time.  This seems supported by the court’s finding that the family had fractured, “charging each other with misrepresentation, fraud and deceit,” and the suit brought “to satiate their dissatisfaction and impatience.”

The Virginia Supreme Court dealt with a number of questions raised by different groups of beneficiaries:

• Does it matter if the contest was brought in good faith or with probable cause?  Not here.

• Does it matter if a contestant withdrew before the final order?  No, they still brought the contest.

• Does it matter if a beneficiary was a minor and the contest was brought by a representative?  No.

Of importance for estate planning, the Court interpreted the clause strictly by the terms used in the will:

The court is not concerned with whether an heir or a devisee receives the property of a decedent. The normal freedom of the owner to dispose of his property as he sees fit should not be curtailed unless the disposition violates some rule of law or is against public policy.

Used indiscriminately, a no-contest clause can create difficulties resolving genuine disputes (such as working through this series of documents or ensuring a fiduciary is handling matters correctly), can disincentivize compromise (once the suit was filed, all benefit was lost unless successful), and may result in a more severe penalty than desired.

In Virginia, no-contest clauses are still upheld on the exact language actually used, as described in Hunter v. Hunter (Va. 2020):

We have reconciled these competing values by stating that no-contest provisions are simultaneously “strictly enforced” and “strictly construed.”  By strictly enforced, we mean that we will enforce the provision without any wincing on our part concerning its alleged harshness or unfairness — so long as the testator or settlor clearly intended the forfeiture.  By strictly construed, we mean that the intent to forfeit must be very clear. .    

So, for instance, a grantor of an irrevocable trust with a no-contest clause who is also its sole beneficiary forfeits his rights as beneficiary if he challenges the trust trying to get his money back.  McMurtrie v. McMurtrie (Va. 2021, unpublished).

Much of the animosity between George Parramore’s family members seems to have come not from the litigation itself, but in recriminating each other over the application of the no-contest clause.  Ultimately, the only winner was Christ Episcopal Church in Eastville, which was probably not the result Mr. Parramore was hoping for.    If you are thinking of using a clause like this, discuss the details with an attorney who has seen how they have been applied in administration and litigation so you get the result you are looking for when the terms are “strictly enforced” and “strictly construed.”

Next in the Lessons From Litigation series: How to Prove a Deceased Person’s Claim

Virginia attorney Jonathan A. Nelson uses his extensive legal knowledge and trial experience to resolve conflicts, negotiate settlements, navigate compliance matters, and vigorously advocate in the courtroom in order to achieve the best possible outcomes for his clients. He practices in estate planning, probate, trust and estate administration, corporate law, and civil litigation related to these fields.

The attorneys of Smith Pugh & Nelson, PLC, offer the experienced counsel, personal attention, and customized legal services needed to address the many complex issues surrounding estate planning, probate, and trust administration. Contact us at (703) 777-6084 to schedule a consultation.

Lessons from Litigation: Draft for Longevity so You Don’t “Barr” Your Rights

by Jonathan A. Nelson

The Virginia Court of Appeals recently issued an unpublished opinion regarding a 1914 right of way easement used for logging, in Barr v. Garten Development, LLC.  An unpublished opinion is not precedent, but does yield practical advice.  Here are two lessons for drafting documents we can gain from the 100 years of history in this case.

First, keep the certainty of change in mind.  In Barr, the 1914 Deed establishing the right of way reserved the right to place across the land “a broad gauge railroad, and for narrow gauge railroad tracks to and from any mines… [and] wagon roads.”  Had the deed stopped there, the subsequent changes in transportation (coupled with the economic realities which led to releasing the mineral rights in 1979) might have decided this case before it started. 

Fortunately for the owner of the easement, the attorney in 1914 included a catch-all phrase reserving “all necessary rights of way… and more particularly for the proper ingress and egress….”  These were enough for the Court of Appeals to find the right of way included improving an unpaved road to the standards of the Department of Forestry for use by logging trucks.

I can see the benefit of applying this principle in a number of contexts. If I am writing a medical directive and someone has a strong preference regarding, say, being put on a ventilator, am I leaving enough flexibility and authority for the agent if the technology is radically different in ten years?  If I am creating a trust making sure minor children are taken care of, do I also write it so that if it doesn’t kick in until they are 50 they aren’t treated like children?  When crafting a transition plan for a family business, have I adequately provided for what happens if someone dies before the transition is completed?  Not everything can be anticipated, but attorneys should balance details and principles so we don’t build any time bombs into the documents.

Second, keep the terminology of previous documents as they were used, even if the language seems antiquated or just different from your usual wording.  A 1979 deed included a release of some rights; the landowner, who didn’t want logging trucks driving on a new and improved road over their land, argued that the release included the 1914 right of way.  The Court found, however, that the release of “all restrictions, easements and mineral rights” did not include the right of way because “on the face of the 1914 Deed, the terms ‘easement’ and ‘rights of way’ are not used interchangeably.”  Regardless of what the 1979 landowner thought he was getting, since abandonment of a right of way has to be “clear and unequivocal” on the face of the deed, he didn’t get it, and it may have been because the attorney drafting the deed didn’t preserve the original word usage.  If necessary, provide explanations of how the terms are used going forward, but don’t omit it; tell the story.

Sometimes attorneys need more time or documentation than a client expects, but this lost continuity is exactly the kind of issue we want to avoid – if we put land into a trust in a way that a divorce decree or premarital agreement prohibited, or try to transfer ownership of an LLC in a way that triggers a buyback with tax consequences, we aren’t doing the client any favors.  It is also a caution to those drafting their own documents, using online forms, or working outside their expertise: if you miss a term of art or don’t understand that in 1914 attorneys used a word differently, you may inadvertently create a big problem that we will read about in a Court of Appeals opinion.

Next in the Lessons From Litigation series: No-Contest Confusion Helps a Church

Virginia attorney Jonathan A. Nelson uses his extensive legal knowledge and trial experience to resolve conflicts, negotiate settlements, navigate compliance matters, and vigorously advocate in the courtroom in order to achieve the best possible outcomes for his clients. He practices in estate planning, probate, trust and estate administration, corporate law, and civil litigation related to these fields.

The attorneys of Smith Pugh & Nelson, PLC, offer the experienced counsel, personal attention, and customized legal services needed to address the many complex issues surrounding estate planning, probate, and trust administration. Contact us at (703) 777-6084 to schedule a consultation.

Estate Planning in Practice: When an Attorney Asks a Family Member to Leave the Room

by Jonathan A. Nelson

At all stages in life, our family members play an important role in supporting and assisting us. This can be especially true with respect to matters incorporated into estate planning documents, including emergency care, aging considerations, and ensuring that survivors are provided for financially and otherwise.  There are times when it is necessary or appropriate to use professional or corporate fiduciaries, of course, but most often, relatives who live nearby and who know our circumstances, are already involved in caring for us, and have a long history of trustworthiness are the ones named to these important roles. 

When I prepare estate planning documents, the person who will be signing the documents is my client.  In my experience, it is not unusual for a key member of the family to accompany a client to the attorney’s office for the meetings needed to set up and sign estate planning documents.  Sometimes their presence is helpful; at other times, the best way for me to serve my client is to have their family member step out of the room for a time.

Some of the reasons I might ask a relative to leave the room are below. These reasons often benefit the person being asked to leave, and may help them avoid civil or criminal liability down the road.

1. Clout (undue influence) – When a client wants to benefit a specific family member, I have to discuss this separately from that person.

2. Credentialing – Before taking information from a family member on behalf of the client, I need to find out independently the nature of that relationship.

3. Confidentiality – Attorney-client privilege is usually voided by having a family member in the room. Especially if there is a likelihood of conflict, I err on the side of caution. The last thing one wants is a family member put on the witness stand and compelled to repeat a conversation that could have been kept confidential.

4. Comfort – I may pick up an undercurrent during the meeting (e.g., a relationship has changed, previously unanticipated questions need to be asked, or unresolved disagreements exist) that are preventing my client from feeling completely secure discussing their documents or goals.

5. Competence – Similar to the undue influence reasoning, clients are best served by documents that will hold up in court. Sometimes that means confirming that the client has sufficient capacity on his or her own to execute the documents.

Most family members recognize that being asked to step out of the room for some or all of an estate planning meeting is necessary and helpful, and that ultimately they and I are both there to support the client.

Virginia attorney Jonathan A. Nelson uses his extensive legal knowledge and trial experience to resolve conflicts, negotiate settlements, navigate compliance matters, and vigorously advocate in the courtroom in order to achieve the best possible outcomes for his clients. He practices in estate planning, probate, trust and estate administration, corporate law, and civil litigation related to these fields.

The attorneys of Smith Pugh & Nelson, PLC, offer the experienced counsel, personal attention, and customized legal services needed to address the many complex issues surrounding estate planning, probate, and trust administration. Contact us at (703) 777-6084 to schedule a consultation.

Stages of Life & Estate Planning: Divorce

An estate plan can be as simple or as complicated as the assets involved and the people involved, and most divorces create additional complications.  Depending on the circumstances, there may even be differing phases the estate planning documents need to go through.

For example, if someone created estate plan documents with their spouse then entered a separation, they may particularly want to change their power of attorney and medical directive to protect against use by an angry spouse. A revised will can also be a good idea.  Virginia is traditionally unwilling to presume that a separation will end in divorce rather than reconciliation, so while there are certain provisions of a will that are automatically terminated by entry of a divorce decree (such as the spouse serving as Executor), during the separation period those are still operational and could even be dangerous (for instance, the Executor becomes the custodian of the decedent's attorney-client privilege and would have a right to access the divorce attorney’s files).

Upon divorce, the former spouse is removed by law from many aspects of estate planning documents even if they aren't changed, but new documents are helpful in documenting the changes, protecting against misuse of the old documents, updating to new trusted people, and filling contingencies that didn't have to be considered before.  In addition, there are times when re-including the former spouse makes sense, such as making the former spouse a successor owner of a shared child's 529 account; some changes may even be required to comply with a property settlement agreement or divorce decree, such as when a life insurance trust is mandated or a party negotiates for estate planning provisions in lieu of requiring liquidation of an income-producing asset.    

Remarriage creates a raft of new issues usually advisable to address in a premarital agreement.  Especially with a remarriage later in life, a trust may end up being necessary to allow a continuing balance after death between providing for a new spouse and for children from the prior marriage and trying to manage the inherent grounds for conflict between them.

Your estate planning attorney will probably need to see your divorce decree and property settlement agreement to ensure your new plan doesn't run afoul of your continuing legal obligations. If your attorney assisted with a joint estate plan before your separation, he or she may not be able to assist either party with planning during the separation or post-divorce, as confidential information shared in the joint plan creates a potential conflict of interest for the attorney.  

Next in this series: Retirement

Virginia attorney Jonathan A. Nelson uses his extensive legal knowledge and trial experience to resolve conflicts, negotiate settlements, navigate compliance matters, and vigorously advocate in the courtroom in order to achieve the best possible outcomes for his clients. He practices in estate planning, probate, trust and estate administration, corporate law, and civil litigation related to these fields.

The attorneys of Smith Pugh & Nelson, PLC, offer the experienced counsel, personal attention, and customized legal services needed to address the many complex issues surrounding estate planning, probate, and trust administration. Contact us at (703) 777-6084 to schedule a consultation.

Stages of Life & Estate Planning: Emptying the Nest

by Jonathan A. Nelson

With young families, the focus in estate planning is often for their children’s guardianship and daily care.  As the children grow, the focus may shift from primarily handling worst-case scenarios to making sure assets are available for their education and then one's own wealth transition.  

Wills and Powers of Attorney likely require updates during such transitions.  Rather than using outside fiduciaries, adult children themselves may begin to fill emergency roles, become ready to handle asset administration, and help each other with continuing management.  Sometimes, having a child with special needs or one needing additional maturing means setting up special provisions, and good or bad relationships with children, children's spouses, and grandchildren can mean more dimensions.

If disposable income rises or starts to descend from an older generation, wealth accumulation may warrant strategies to minimize taxes and administration expenses.  These elements often point to creating one or more trusts to reduce the difficulty and cost of estate administration and allow for more specific or longer-term provisions.  With small businesses or income-generating real property, care may be required to ensure continued business operation; sometimes, adding business interests to trusts or writing equity purchase agreements is also advisable in order to set up seamless leadership transitions, particularly as having all the family members suddenly become managers isn't always the best plan.

Next in this series: Estate Planning and Divorce

Virginia attorney Jonathan A. Nelson uses his extensive legal knowledge and trial experience to resolve conflicts, negotiate settlements, navigate compliance matters, and vigorously advocate in the courtroom in order to achieve the best possible outcomes for his clients. He practices in estate planning, probate, trust and estate administration, corporate law, and civil litigation related to these fields.

The attorneys of Smith Pugh & Nelson, PLC, offer the experienced counsel, personal attention, and customized legal services needed to address the many complex issues surrounding estate planning, probate, and trust administration. Contact us at (703) 777-6084 to schedule a consultation.

Stages of Life & Estate Planning: 529s and Estates

by Jonathan A. Nelson

Education savings plans authorized by Section 529 of the Internal Revenue Code are a popular investment tool designed to make education more affordable by providing a series of tax benefits, when everything goes right.

Everything does not always go right.

By way of background, a 529 account is established by one or more Contributors (who upon providing the assets has made a completed gift which can thereafter grow tax free) and is held and administered by an Owner who does not have to be the Contributor.  The account has a Designated Beneficiary, and withdrawals from the account by the Owner are tax-free if then expended for qualifying education expenses of the Designated Beneficiary.  If the Designated Beneficiary ages out or does not need the funds, the Owner can change the Designated Beneficiary (usually to another family member to avoid tax consequences); thanks to a recent change in law, the Owner can now instead roll the account over to a Roth IRA for the Designated Beneficiary.  However, the Owner has full control of the account and can intentionally disregard the beneficiary designation if willing to pay the tax penalties for doing so.

One particular contingency is not well covered by law: if the Owner passes away and has not designated a successor Owner of the account, it becomes part of the deceased Owner's probate estate.  The Owner's Executor then has control of the 529 account, and not only can disregard the beneficiary designation, but may be required by state law to do so where creditors have not been paid or residuary beneficiaries have not consented to distribution of the account in a form continuing to benefit the Designated Beneficiary.

I suggest a few actions to help avoid this result:

1. Designate one or more successor Owners for any 529s you control.  This makes the change a non-probate transfer.

2. If you have a trust, consider making the Trustee the Owner or successor Owner.  Besides solving the succession problem, this allows greater continued control over the benefit the accounts provide, and it may be advantageous to have assets which can grow without the trust incurring income tax liability.

3. Include language in your will or trust specifically affirming 529 accounts continuing to be for the benefit of the Designated Beneficiary and giving the Executor or Trustee authority for Owner actions, including designating a new Owner.  (These provisions will be state specific and need to be tailored to how probate in your state needs to be concluded.)

Next in this series: Emptying the Nest

Virginia attorney Jonathan A. Nelson uses his extensive legal knowledge and trial experience to resolve conflicts, negotiate settlements, navigate compliance matters, and vigorously advocate in the courtroom in order to achieve the best possible outcomes for his clients. He practices in estate planning, probate, trust and estate administration, corporate law, and civil litigation related to these fields.

The attorneys of Smith Pugh & Nelson, PLC, offer the experienced counsel, personal attention, and customized legal services needed to address the many complex issues surrounding estate planning, probate, and trust administration. Contact us at (703) 777-6084 to schedule a consultation.

LAW UPDATE: Virginia Court of Appeals Underscores the Importance of Estate Planning ‘Boilerplate’

Fiduciary litigation can get very tangled.  In Kosmann v. Brown, decided July 23, 2024, the Virginia Court of Appeals addressed a case where a principal (“Brown”) signed on the same day a power of attorney and a revocable trust which gave certain authority over the trust to the holder agent under the power of attorney (“Monroe”).  After Brown became incapacitated, Monroe signed an amendment to the trust under the putative authority of the power of attorney cutting out the other beneficiaries in favor of herself, changing the successor trustees, and making the trust irrevocable so the changes would be permanent.

The Loudoun County Circuit Court resolved the matter before trial on purely legal grounds, determining that the action taken was outside the authority granted by the trust to an attorney-in-fact, and the Virginia Court of Appeals has now affirmed this finding.  To reach this conclusion, the Court looked in detail at the exact language of the trust and of the power of attorney and took a deep dive into the definitions built into Virginia’s versions of the Uniform Trust Code, the Uniform Powers of Appointment Act, and the Uniform Power of Attorney Act.  

The Court pointed to a few general things: (1) the trust instrument controls over a power of attorney as to whether the power of attorney can be used to change the trust, (2) an attorney-in-fact is limited to the grant of authority in the power of attorney even if the trust would otherwise allow an action, and (3) a court will look to who the ‘powerholder’ is in determining whether a power of appointment has been exercised.  

The Court also included a veiled warning to the parties - if this matter were to go back for trial, the validity of the trust amendment would still hinge on the factual question of whether the attorney-in-fact acted within the expectations of the principal, in the best interests of the principal, and in good faith.

All of those are important points for fiduciary administration and litigation.  For estate planning, this decision underscores the importance of the administrative ‘boilerplate’ language in your documents.  The Court’s result hinged on the trust’s prohibition on an attorney-in-fact exercising a power of appointment, but the finding could have been very different if the language was broader or more narrow. 

Your estate planning attorney can assess what is important or helpful for your circumstances and draft or make changes to your documents as appropriate. In my practice, I frequently customize documents for a client’s specific situation. It might be to avoid a foreseeable conflict; add extra instructions particular to a complicated asset; or give a fiduciary flexibility for changes in circumstances which may arise far in the future.  You should regularly review the terms of your documents, and whether they make sense with the people in your life, because you know them better than your attorney does. Talking through your questions with an experienced estate planning attorney will help make sure the documents you have in place work out the way you intend.

Virginia attorney Jonathan A. Nelson uses his extensive legal knowledge and trial experience to resolve conflicts, negotiate settlements, navigate compliance matters, and vigorously advocate in the courtroom in order to achieve the best possible outcomes for his clients. He practices in estate planning, probate, trust and estate administration, corporate law, and civil litigation related to these fields.

The attorneys of Smith Pugh & Nelson, PLC, offer the experienced counsel, personal attention, and customized legal services needed to address the many complex issues surrounding estate planning, probate, and trust administration. Contact us at (703) 777-6084 to schedule a consultation.